Page 2 of 3

Re: New Public EgoWiki

Posted: Sun Mar 06, 2011 11:30 pm
by Zefz

Re: New Public EgoWiki

Posted: Sun Mar 06, 2011 11:32 pm
by penguinflyer5234

Re: New Public EgoWiki

Posted: Sun Mar 06, 2011 11:35 pm
by Zefz
That one should be put down :/ informe is still haunting us from the past. It's like a nasty beast that refuses to go down.

Re: New Public EgoWiki

Posted: Mon Mar 07, 2011 3:08 am
by woodmouse
Zefz wrote:That one should be put down :/ informe is still haunting us from the past. It's like a nasty beast that refuses to go down.
At least I have a lot of good memories of informe... :P

Re: New Public EgoWiki

Posted: Mon Mar 07, 2011 6:42 am
by Agent of Dread
I enjoyed the fun times, but that thing was so retarded it's not even funny.

Re: New Public EgoWiki

Posted: Fri Mar 11, 2011 1:06 am
by Seth
¶ I recently edited the tranch page so it would look more formal: http://egoboo.sourceforge.net/wiki/index.php/Tranch
¶ There do not seem to be any clear policies or rules I could find on that wiki, so I just tried to make the style look as formal as I could. Will we be standardizing any policies in the near future?

Re: New Public EgoWiki

Posted: Fri Mar 11, 2011 8:47 am
by Zefz
Sure, as long as we pick a standard that we stick with.
monster standard wrote:(image)
Type: (magical, humanoid, insect, undead etc.)
Difficulty: (easy, normal, hard, etc.)
Description: blah blah
Weaknesses: (if any)

Re: New Public EgoWiki

Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2011 8:15 pm
by Seth
¡Spambot, spambot, spambot; more rubbish here!

¶ Also, about my Wiki writing: could I please have permission to use ligatures and uncommon words? I confess I am a bit of a pedant and I like to make my writing look ‘scientific’, if you will, like replacing “poison” with “hæmotoxis” (for example). I ask this since I am afraid inserting them could possibly make searching more difficult, or otherwise make the descriptions look obfuscated. Although I do have hope context will help clarify the meaning of such words.
¶ I re‐wrote the entry for the Sand Palace a while ago. I would appreciate it if someone reviewed it for me.

Re: New Public EgoWiki

Posted: Thu Mar 24, 2011 9:05 pm
by penguinflyer5234
I would say use what Egoboo uses, e.g. poison.

(also, maybe the moderators can somehow be able to delete spam pages?)

Re: New Public EgoWiki

Posted: Mon Apr 18, 2011 4:54 pm
by woodmouse
I forgot if there was a thread for the page of Egoboo in Wikipedia. :P Anyway, I edited it with the newer updates and stuff, and added references, etc...

Re: New Public EgoWiki

Posted: Mon Apr 18, 2011 9:50 pm
by penguinflyer5234
you didn't edit the egowiki urls :?

Re: New Public EgoWiki

Posted: Mon Apr 18, 2011 10:21 pm
by woodmouse
penguinflyer5234 wrote:you didn't edit the egowiki urls :?
That's a too big thing for my intelligence. Who knows what would happen. :P

Re: New Public EgoWiki

Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2011 1:27 am
by Seth

Re: New Public EgoWiki

Posted: Tue Jan 10, 2012 3:03 am
by penguinflyer5234
Can we please disable anonymous posting in the wiki? The bots are constantly spamming Talk:Tech Zone. :|

EDIT: Or maybe upgrading to MediaWiki 1.18?

Re: New Public EgoWiki

Posted: Tue Jan 10, 2012 10:01 pm
by Zefz
Isn't the wiki a part of sourceforge? Can we even upgrade it? Or did we install a custom wiki? I don't remember :P